You all remember Harvey Mudd, right? That school where someone called Hillary Clinton a "foxy lesbian" and received a talking to and a campus wide email to everyone?
Well, now someone was quoting an Asian comedy and used the "negao" word, so you know people are going to be upset. Mudd's Interim Vice President and Dean of Students Guy L. Gerbick has officially freaked out and sent an email to his and now Pomona's entire campus. I'm sure you'll be shocked to know that Gerbick is author of a bogus paper entitled "Diversity Works: The Emerging Picture of How Students Benefit."
For the actual record, there's very little, if any evidence to suggest "diversity" is good. Social scientist Robert Putnam of Bowling Alone fame concluded that it may actually cause groups to "hunker down" in ethnic enclaves. Sound familiar?
Notice how at the end they talk about how a "black man" will be president. I wonder where their sympathies lie. I'm offended that they would suggest that the reason he'll win is that he's black...
Let's go line by line.
Last Friday night, an HMC student entered the room of another Mudder where several people were gathered watching an Asian comedy movie. The entering student, quoting a line from another Asian comedy, said "good morning, negao," which is intended to sound like the word "nigga" with a Japanese accent. Realizing that the joke wasn't funny to the group, the entering student quickly left the room.So the joke isn't funny. And? Does this really warrant the Dean's disapproval? Are we going to ban all jokes or art that uses the phrases "nigger" or "nigga" now?
The next day the host of the gathering wrote to a dorm chat list forcefully expressing her offense at the use of the n-word, even in jest or imitation. Other people similarly wrote of their offense. The offending student wrote to the list explaining why she said what she did and apologized for offending people. She also apologized to the host in person.
Apologize. Apologize! Anyone thinking this scene from South Park right now?
While some people may not consider this a bias-related incident or act of hate, it starkly highlights several important points for everyone at Mudd.
1. Harvey Mudd's goal is to provide a safe, supportive community of respect for everyone on campus.
Safe and supportive? Isn't education supposed to be just the opposite? Something that draws out actual discussion and moves you beyond your comfort zones to genuine wisdom?
2. While everyone has full free speech rights here, words can have real consequences. When you say something, even in a light-hearted way with no bad intent, people can be substantially, negatively impacted. Your use of language can even affect the great amount of work that many people have done to build a community that values the differences we all bring to being Mudders.
First of all, impact isn't a transitive verb. You can't be "impacted" by something, unless its a tooth or an asteroid. Second, so what if your language offends people? They retain the right to hate you or spread rumors about you. But you still retain the right to speak or make unfunny jokes.
3. Saying racist, sexist, or homophobic things doesn't just affect people of color, women, or gay people. It has real effects on people in majority groups and makes for an unwelcoming environment for everyone.
Notice how Mr. Gerbick conflates the use of a bad racialist joke with actual acts of homophobia, sexism or racism. Shame on him for making light of those incidents, few in number though they may actually be.
If you want to talk with a supportive person trained in talking about race, please check the list of MAP (Multicultural Ally Program) allies at http://www.hmc.edu/about/
An "ally"? Is this a war? Why has your proctor been through mandatory sensitivity training which is, by and large, bunk?
4. We need to talk more about race. So, this Friday's Forum will have Gary Kelly leading a discussion on race, including clips from a full-length movie completely devoted to how people feel about the use of the n-word. We can then talk about how to continue the discussions, particularly as the possibility of a black man being president of the U.S. becomes more probable.
Please, if Obama's elected, it'll be because he's a Socialist, not because he's black (all that certainly does help get out the guilty, Volvo-driving, latte-drinking, progressive vote.)
12 comments:
Are there people you personally know who uses the n-word around you? Does it rub you the wrong way? If so please pass on the following information to them:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP2U0jmZjec
I do have to say that I love the way Pomona's deans sent out the forward. "As per our 5C protocol" - ie, even we don't agree with this nonsense, but it's policy so here it is.
"We can then talk about how to continue the discussions, particularly as the possibility of a black man being president of the U.S. becomes more probable."
Nowhere does it say he will be elected because he is black. You read into things so much it's mind-boggling sometimes.
Does the protocol say that all the campuses have to inform us when these things happen or not? Why hasn't there been a CMC email?
"First of all, impact isn't a transitive verb."
For what it's worth, few things are more obnoxious than people who correct the grammar of others but don't know what they're talking about.
Gerbick next book "Our Pansy Nation" should be a big seller!
Charles:
I've been reading your stuff recently, and have to say that I'm very interested in a lot of it and impressed by the caliber of your blog. However, I found this piece very immature and poorly done compared to the other writing here. I just want to point out that schools *should* be safe and supportive. While you're right that education should definitely push the boundaries, learning can't take place in an unsafe/uncomfortable environment. The data on suicide rates among gay teens supports this (I'm curious to hear what you think on this issue). Also, your response to point 2 just makes me think that you're bitter because you've probably been called fat when you were younger. And really, bringing up an issue like grammar is just unprofessional journalism.
I'm looking forward to reading more of your stuff; I like hearing from a more conservative point of view, as it's pretty repressed around here.
I'd still like to know why the person who discharged a fire extinguisher in the Queer Resource Center never had to apologize for it. Because there's nothing to apologize for?
H. Lewis Smith,
While it's laudable to personally not use racial slurs, it's disturbing to censor other students.
The impact thing is a bit of a pet peeve. I don't really care about any other grammar issue.
To suggest that the suicide rates of homosexuals is someone connected with the speech of other students is disturbing, to say the least. What else are you prepared to ban? Must we walk on eggshells because others are mentally imbalanced?
I was never called fat, by the way. In fact, I was in better shape as a child than I am now.
Well, no one discharged it in the QRC. It just didn't happen. They discharged it outside of the place.
"The impact thing is a bit of a pet peeve."
It's just based on prescriptivist elitism. It's one of those corrections which sounds intelligent but ultimately reveals etymological ignorance.
"While it's laudable to personally not use racial slurs, it's disturbing to censor other students."
I'm not sure censorship has occurred here. If you say something racially insensitive, you should be prepared for a backlash. I'll defend your right to say any words you want, but don't be surprised if people take offense.
I think a community without hateful language is a perfectly defensible goal. Helping people to understand the effects that their words might have isn't the same as censorship.
Obama's socialist??? I hope this was supposed to be a joke or exaggeration for effect. But one liners like this really poison the political discourse.
And on the diversity point. See: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8353.html - great book, well respected in academic circles. "Diversity" does not just mean racial affirmative action in schools -- so when you say "there's little evidence diversity is good" - I think this requires much more detail on what exactly you mean by that.
I think there's plenty of evidence to suggest that Obama will use Socialist tactics to effect his socialist ends. Fairness doctrine, progressive taxation, card check... The list goes on.
As for The Difference, the author's statement presumes equivalent intelligences and is hence not the kind of diversity favored by Obama, college administrators, etc.
There is no empirical evidence by any respected sociologist that diversity -- by which I mean the diversity of skin color, ethnic origin, sex, etc. -- improves the education of children.
Post a Comment